The stories from the Irish Mythological cycles are a bit different than those we’ve read from the other cultures. These are, just as they are told, stories. They are written and told in the same ways that fairytales are told. There is so much more meaning to them when they are performed compared to when they are read. Yes, these stories have mythological aspects to them, but they are different in a couple ways. Firstly, they aren’t full of lessons and guidelines. These are just stories about origins written to entertain. Sure, they give some meaning to questions of “where does this come from?” and “how did this begin?” but they are unlike other myths because they do not teach as much as they entertain. Also, they are full of imagery and detail different from other myths. This is for the purpose of creating the story in your head and watching it come to life as it is told. Just as fairytales are full of imagery and detail to keep us entertained and imaginative, these stories are written and told in the same ways. Some of the parts of the story can even be loosely compared to our own culture’s fairytales. For example, Balor had only one child, a daughter. It was foretold that he would die by the hand of his grandson. “So he built another tower and shut the girl up in it with twelve women to guard her” (page 5). This can be compared to the story of Rapunzel, who spent the first half of her life locked in a tower.
It was so much different to watch the bardic performance than to read it. First of all, hearing the words and reading the words almost made it seem like two completely different stories! (It kind of sounds like Williamson says “two headed anan” instead of” Tuatha De Danaan”).Second of all, there is so much more feeling and meaning in the performance. When the stories are being performed, event details are left out, and imagery details are exaggerated. Tone of voice and actions change the perspective of the story and make it much more entertaining. Heaney goes into much more detail about events and sequences in her book than Williamson does in his performance. For example, Heaney tells of how Balor got his evil eye when he peeks into a high window in which magicians are practicing their spells and he sees nothing but fumes and gases. The smoke gets in his eye and he cannot open it. “When the druid saw what had happened to Balor, ‘That spell we were making was a spell of death and the fumes from it have brought the power of death to your eye. If you look on anyone with that evil eye it means they will die!’ And so Balor got his name” (page 4). Williamson barely even talks about the powers of Balor in his performance. The importance of events seems to be much different between storytelling by performance and storytelling by writing.
I think it’s really interesting how important performing the stories of these myths seems to be in the Irish culture. Because they are created more for entertainment and community, written accounts are less common than performance in passing the stories on through the generations. Irish people are very full of energy and detail, and hold great importance in getting together to tell their tales. It is kind of a stereotype I think. Often times, Irish and Scottish cultures are portrayed as storytelling cultures, and from the performance of this myth, I can definitely see why. It is so entertaining to hear the stories with energy and vocal application, and it holds much more value than reading them. Seeing how passionate and energetic a storyteller is in performing these myths makes me understand why these stories are still around and being passed on.